Finding Dory Review

Finding Dory

If you liked Finding Nemo, but thought it was too long or stands on its own too well, Lee has a review of Finding Dory just for you!


A fun exercise budding writers may try once or twice for good practice is one in which they artificially extend an existing story, often one with a definitive ending, by inventing conflicts before and during the existing events and having these form an alternative resolve that, ideally, both informs and explores further the pre-existing narrative.

What’s most interesting in the exercise is that writers can learn a lot about ‘forced conflicts’; that inventing drama and fleshing out side-characters does not always equate to a more compelling story and often feels superfluous to the narrative as a whole. Set-up complete; enter Finding Dory.

Aside from its extraneous relation to Finding Nemo, a story it not only follows-up on but actually requires from the audience a strong connection with for a number of its key moments to pay-off (such as Marlin’s entire arc), Finding Dory makes a number of mistakes even in the aspects of its narrative that are wholly independent.

Dory’s short-term memory loss, a uniquely conflicting issue in and of itself as it tries to balance being funny, charming, emphatic and challenging at the same time, acts as the plot-forwarding device as Dory pieces together her past in her attempts to find her parents. The issue with this device is that, at any point, the narrative can be advanced at any random time with any fleeting reference or off-visual cue, leading to a disconnect with the audience as we can’t predict when something will trigger with Dory and so can’t root for her when she makes a link.

Working with the logic that a good puzzle or mystery gives us all or just enough of the information to remain invested in the unravel, Finding Dory withholds every bit of information until the moment it’s relevant, meaning the film maintains a directionless feel throughout. One could argue that the narrative is simply reflecting Dory’s state of mind, in that she doesn’t know what’s happening until she knows, which might work if this were a slower, more focused character piece. However, in the spirit of a fast-moving action-adventure, Finding Dory feels like a rollercoaster in the worst sense: a pre-meditated, on-rails experience that might elicit some emotion on the twists and turns, but all of which are reactionary as we simply can’t fully predict or anticipate what’s coming to commit or invest ourselves.

Some good jokes (the sea lions in general were hilarious), the lovely setting, most of the new characters and the compact scale of this smaller Finding adventure will likely be picked up as a good time for the kids watching, and it is certainly entertaining when it wants to be, but too much of the movie rides on a faulty plot device and a predictable message of ‘family is what you make of it’ that, while good intentioned, feels exactly like a conflict imagined around a story in a creative exercise to create a sequel to Finding Nemo, not something that naturally came of its own accord.



3 thoughts on “Finding Dory Review

  1. Nice review. I’ve always loved Finding Nemo and still do. I wasn’t expecting whole lot from this movie, but I was intrigued to see it. I agree with many that it didn’t beat out the original film, but Finding Nemo had a great message, humorous bits, and colorful characters.

    Liked by 1 person

  2. I feel about it in much the same way I do about Monster’s University. The bits that were sad were appropriately sad and the bits that were funny were appropriately funny (the Sigourney Weaver bit in particular was great but they relied on it one too many times I feel). All the talent you’ve come to expect from Pixar is present but I can’t help but feel there is something missing. I don’t even feel comfortable saying it ‘lacked heart’ because it’s evident the creators did give a shit about what they were making. I suppose the whole thing seems slightly artificial? Unnecessary? In any case, it’s clear this was a very ‘safe’ film made for money as opposed to anything else and I guess that leaves a sour taste in my mouth. It did make me wonder how good the original Finding Nemo and how much of our fondness for it is rose-tinted goggles (which is a worrying feeling for an otherwise competently made film to induce).

    Liked by 1 person

    • Wow, shows how much damage an unnecessary sequel can do to the classics!
      I’ve rewatched Finding Nemo a few times now. The jokes don’t really work twice and the story has little depth to it, but the boundless creativity and wonder of the world they’ve built still shines through and, for kids watching for a first time, I’m sure it still blows them away. It’s also way too long though 😉


Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s